Deep exposure drawer agreement did not disclose the restructuring of Vanke chaos or suspected violat-xxjjyy.com

Deep exposure drawer agreement did not disclose the restructuring of Vanke chaos or suspected violations before the Shenzhen City Metro Group Chairman Lin Maode since Vanke exposure and reorganization have agreement on gambling, would be mired in equity dispute Vanke again to a public opinion in the teeth of the storm. After failing to disclose the restructuring plan related to the agreement on gambling, Vanke or suspected violation letter phi, which also had the deep in jeopardy Vanke and restructuring group added a new trouble. Deep exposure chairman drawer agreement in city rail transit financing mechanism of the national development and Reform Commission held in September 8th innovation seminar, Lin Maode on Asset Securitization on the MTR property when he said, "we all know that we are involved in a listed company, but also can not say, many people asked why I participate in first, I told it to bet, we hold you about 2000000000 shares, must maintain annual (per share) a piece of money to me, to give me 2 billion points per year, equivalent to the cash flow is very good. Second, it increased 100 times over the past 20 years, the next ten years to grow 1 times I earn 50 billion, an increase of 2 times I earn 100 billion, I have a loan repayment source ". As is in the sensitive time Vanke Group’s deep restructuring, Lin Maode mentioned "a listed company" was also widespread speculation in the market Vanke equity dispute. 7 2 April, Vanke released trading plan (Revised) shows that the listed company intends to buy deep sea 100% International Group holds equity by way of issue of shares, the transaction price of 456.13 million yuan. Vanke will all to issue shares to pay the transaction price to 15.88 yuan, the stock issue price, to the final deep group issued shares of approximately 2 billion 870 million shares. This is very consistent with Lin Maode’s position. In this view, the process of deep restructuring of Vanke Group and, there is a hidden drawer agreement, but did not disclose the restructuring plan. Undisclosed or suspected violations in Shanghai Huarong lawyer Xu Feng opinion, because of the gambling agreement did not disclose the restructuring plan, which may give Vanke big trouble. "Gambling" is different from the general terms, the impact on the interests of Vanke itself is also very large, should be possible risk hints." In the eyes of a private person, if Lin Maode according to the bet agreement, Vanke will have to keep "every 10 shares sent 10 yuan" bonus rhythm. "If in accordance with the current total share capital of Vanke’s calculation, the equivalent of every year to come up with more than 10 billion yuan in cash to pay dividends, if Vanke’s performance cannot maintain rapid growth, high dividends may continue to the company’s cash flow and pressure." The private person said. Shanghai Minglun lawyer Wang Zhibin is that Vanke in the disclosure of the restructuring plan did not complete disclosure of important terms of the transaction, constitutes a violation of information disclosure, constitute a false statement. Vanke is likely to face penalties from regulators and will face a lot of investor lawsuits." Wang Zhibin called. Wang Zhibin also believes that if the management of Vanke in the process of misrepresentation in the presence of fault, investors do not rule out the responsibility of management. "Company law" stipulates that "Directors and senior managers violate the provisions of laws, administrative regulations or articles of association, and damage stocks"

深铁曝抽屉协议添乱万科重组 未披露或涉嫌违规 日前,深圳市地铁集团董事长林茂德自曝与万科重组存在对赌协议,将深陷股权之争的万科再度推向了舆论的风口浪尖。由于未在重组方案中披露相关对赌协议,万科或涉嫌信披违规,这也让原本就岌岌可危的万科与深铁集团重组事宜又添新麻烦。深铁董事长曝抽屉协议在国家发改委9月8日召开的城市轨道交通投融资机制创新研讨会上,林茂德在谈及地铁上盖物业的资产证券化方面时曾说,“大家都知道我们正在参与一个上市公司的事,但是又不能多说,很多人问我为什么要参与:第一,我跟它对赌,我们持有你20多亿股后,必须保持每年(每一股)分一块钱给我,每年都要分20亿给我,相当于现金流很好。第二,它过去20多年增长100多倍,它未来十年增长1倍我就赚500亿,增长2倍我就赚1000亿,我贷款就有还款来源了”。由于正处在万科重组深铁集团的敏感时刻,林茂德所提及的“一个上市公司”也被市场普遍猜测为深陷股权之争的万科。7月2日,万科发布的交易预案(修订稿)显示,上市公司拟以发行股份的方式购买深铁集团持有的前海国际100%股权,交易作价456.13亿元。而万科将全部以发行股份的方式支付交易对价,以15.88元 股的发行价计算,最终向深铁集团发行股份约28.7亿股。这与林茂德的表态十分吻合。以此来看,深铁集团与万科重组的过程中,还有着不为人知的抽屉协议,而且并未在重组方案中披露。未披露或涉嫌违规在上海市华荣律师事务所律师许峰看来,由于对赌协议未在重组方案中披露,因而可能会给万科带来大麻烦。“对赌不同于普通条款,对于万科本身利益影响也挺大的,应该对可能存在的风险提示。”在一位私募人士看来,如果按照林茂德所说的对赌协议,万科将每年必须保持“每10股派10元”的分红节奏。“若按照目前万科的总股本计算,相当于每年要拿出逾100亿元现金用来分红,若万科的业绩不能保持快速增长,则持续的高分红可能让公司的现金流等方面承压。”该私募人士称。而上海明伦律师事务所律师王智斌更是认为,万科在披露重组预案中未完整披露重要交易条款,构成信息披露违规,涉嫌构成虚假陈述。“万科有可能会面临监管部门的处罚,还将面临大量的投资者诉讼。”王智斌称。王智斌还认为,如果万科管理层在虚假陈述的过程中存在过错,不排除有投资者追究管理层的责任。《公司法》规定,“董事、高级管理人员违反法律、行政法规或者公司章程的规定,损害股东利益的,股东可以向人民法院提起诉讼”。重组成功难上加难在上述私募人士看来,如果抽屉协议果真存在,将使得万科的重组计划变得难上加难。“华润、宝能此前明确表示对重组方案存在异议,让万科重组深铁集团的方案本身就存在较大的不确定性风险,现如今又曝出抽屉协议,将会再度降低万科及管理层的公众形象,对于重组方案的继续推进肯定是不利的。”实际上,自今年6月18日万科首次披露与深铁集团的重组方案以来,推进就一直不顺利。先是在6月23日,万科股东深圳市钜盛华股份有限公司、前海人寿公开发表《声明》,称“我方明确反对万科本次发行股份购买资产预案,后续在股东大会表决上将据此行使股东权利”。 随后公司股东华润股份有限公司也通过其下属公司华润集团微信公众号回应,称“华润支持万科与深圳地铁在业务层面的合作,反对万科管理层提出的拟发行股份购买资产的重组预案。华润对于万科董事会审议及表决重组预案过程中所存在的问题,已发函向两地监管机构反映,并质疑议案审议过程的合规性及议案通过的有效性”。而包括宝能、华润等重要股东在内,至今尚未就交易方案达成共识。北京商报记者昨日曾就重组方案中对赌协议的相关问题向万科方面进行采访,不过对方未予以回复。股市早报,投资前瞻,涨停预测,牛股捕捉,尽在微信号【凤凰证券】或者【ifengstock】盘后剖析A股走势,指点明日走势,请关注微信号【复盘大师】或【fupan588】相关的主题文章: